Please download to get full document.

View again

of 4

APJCN

APJCN
0 views4 pages
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Documenttranscript
  Reformatted author version Page 1 Influence of obesogenic behaviors on health-related quality of life in adolescents Bamini Gopinath 1 , Jimmy CY Louie 2 , Victoria M Flood  2 , George Burlutsky   1 , Louise L Hardy  3 , Louise A Baur  4,5 , Paul Mitchell  1 1 Centre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2 School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Sydney, NSW, Australia 3 Physical Activity, Nutrition and Obesity Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4 University of Sydney Clinical School, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.   5 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.  Abstract  We aimed to prospectively examine the association between the combined effects of obesogenic behaviors on quality of life (QOL) in adolescents. Of 2353 Sydney schoolchildren surveyed (median age 12.7 years), 1,213  were re-examined 5 years later at age 17-18. Children completed activity and food-frequency questionnaires.  An unhealthy behavior score was calculated, allocating 1 point for the following: <60 minutes of total physical activity/ day; ≥2 hours of screen time/ day; consumed salty snack foods and/or confectionery ≥5 times per  week; ≥1 serves of soft drinks and/or cordial/ day; and not consuming both ≥2 serves of fruit and ≥3 serves of vegetables/ day. Health-related QOL was assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL).  The prevalence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lifestyle risk factors was 4.2%, 17.1%, 30.7%, 30.5%, 13.9% and 3.6%, respectively. After multivariable-adjustment, children engaging in 5 versus 0 unhealthy behaviors had 9.2-units lower PedsQL physical summary score (ptrend=0.001), five years later. Boys reporting 4 or 5 lifestyle risk factors compared to their peers reporting none or one at baseline, had lower total and physical summary scores at follow-up, ptrend=0.02 and 0.01, respectively. Girls engaging in 4 or 5 versus 0 or 1 unhealthy behaviors, had 4.6-units lower physical summary score (ptrend=0.04), five years later. The number of obesogenic lifestyle risk factors was independently associated with subsequent poorer QOL, particularly physical health, during adolescence. These findings underscore the importance of targeting lifestyle behaviors to promote general well-being and physical functioning in adolescents. Key words:  Adolescents, quality of life, lifestyle, diet, Sydney Childhood Eye Study.  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr  . 2013. Epub ahead of print INTRODUCTION Health-related quality of life (QOL) refers to the subset of QOL directly related to an individual’s health, 1  encompassing physical, mental, and social well-being. 2-4  Health-related QOL data have been used for number of years to assess the population burden of illness and disability, to identify health disparities and needs, and to monitor changes over time. 5,6   The importance of individual lifestyle habits for impaired health-related QOL in children and adolescents has been documented in population-based studies. 4,7,8  A Japanese study of adolescents assessed the association between individual lifestyle factors such as sleep duration, physical activity and snack intake on QOL over 10 years. 7  The authors found that shorter sleep duration, irregular snacks and physical inactivity at 3 years of age were associated  with poorer QOL scores in adolescence. Recently, a Canadian cross-sectional study of 3,421 schoolchildren aged 10-11 years found that students with better diet quality and higher physical activity levels were significantly more likely to report better QOL scores. 8  Our group recently showed in a cohort of 2,353  Australian adolescents, that regular physical activity over 5 years  was associated with a higher perceived health-related QOL. 4  Also in this study, lower QOL scores were observed among those adolescents who spent the most time in screen-viewing activities. In contrast, cross-sectional data from a UK study of 1,771 children aged 11-15 years showed that achieving the recommended physical activity and dietary guidelines were not associated with a significantly better QOL. 9  Most previous childhood/ adolescence studies have focused on the effects of unhealthy lifestyle habits separately. The role of a combination of these modifiable lifestyle risk factors on health-related QOL in adolescence has not been examined, particularly in a prospective study. Hence, to address this gap in knowledge,  we used a relatively large cohort of school-aged children followed from age 12 years through to adolescence at age 17-18 years, to assess whether there is a longitudinal association between the number of obesogenic behavioral risk factors (low fruit and  vegetable intake, low physical activity, high screen time, high consumption of sweetened beverages, and high intake of energy-dense nutrient poor snacks) at baseline with health-related QOL five years later in adolescence, independent of potential confounders such as ethnicity, parental education and body mass index (BMI). These epidemiological data could potentially help identify those adolescents who are at higher risk of poorer general  well-being and who would benefit from targeted interventions. 10   METHODS Study population  The Sydney Childhood Eye Study is a population-based survey of eye conditions and other health outcomes in school children living within the Sydney Metropolitan Area, Australia. It was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney, the Department of Education and Training, and the Catholic Education Office, New South Wales, Australia. 11  We obtained informed written consent from at least one parent of each child, as well as verbal assent from each child before the examinations. Study methods have been previously described. 11  Briefly, students of median age 12.7 years in a stratified random cluster sample of 21 high schools across Sydney were eligible to participate. Stratification was based on socioeconomic status data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. This included a proportional mix of public, private or religious high-schools. Data for the 12-year-old cohort were collected during 2004-5. Of the 3,144 eligible 12-year-old children, 2,367 were given parental permission to participate and 2,353 underwent examinations (74.9%). At the 5-year follow-up study (during 2009-11), 1,213 of 12-year old children (51.6% of the baseline participants) were re-examined at ages 17-18 years. While data on unhealthy lifestyle habits were acquired at both time points, QOL was only ascertained at the 5-year follow-up (i.e. in 2009-11).  Assessment of QOL  The PedsQL 4.0 was used to assess quality of life in preadolescents and adolescents and was not srcinally administered at the baseline examination but administered at the follow-up study. The PedsQL is a validated 23-item questionnaire for children aged 2 to 18 years. 12  Mean scores are calculated based on a 5-point response scale for each item and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale with a higher score representing better quality of life.  The PedsQL yields 3 summary scores: a total scale score, a physical health summary score and a psychosocial health summary score. There are 4 sub-scale scores: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and school functioning. The total score comprises the average of all items in the questionnaire. The psychosocial summary comprises the average of the items in the emotional, social and school functioning scales. The physical health summary score comprises the average of items in the physical functioning scale. 12    Reformatted author version Page 2  Assessment of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors  Assessment of dietary data has been previously described. 13  Briefly, dietary data were collected using a 120-item self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), designed for specific use in Australian children and adolescents. 14  An allowance for seasonal variation of fruit and vegetables was made during analysis by weighting seasonal fruits and vegetables. The  validity of the FFQ has been previously reported in children, specifically, correlation coefficients for comparative validity ranged from 0.03 for retinol to 0.56 for magnesium for transformed, energy-adjusted, de-attenuated nutrient data, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.40 for total fat, carbohydrate, sugars, vitamin C, folate and beta-carotene. 14  FFQ items were translated into daily food and nutrient intakes using a purpose built query in Microsoft Access 2007, with NUTTAB2006 15  as the source of nutrition composition. NUTTAB2006, however, does not provide the full range of nutrients of interest, for which we used values from other nutrient databases. 16,17  We also extracted data on the consumption of food groups including vegetables and fruits, as  well as snack foods (e.g. chips, confectionery) which we termed as energy-dense, nutrient poor snacks. Data on the frequency of soft drink (non-diet or regular) and cordial (a sweet flavored concentrated syrup that is mixed with water to taste) consumption, were also obtained from this FFQ.  Assessment of physical activity and screen time in this cohort has also been previously reported. 4  Briefly, children self-reported the time usually spent in various physical pursuits in an average week (e.g. netball, athletics, soccer). The physical activities listed were those most commonly engaged in by this age group and represented those activities which are classified as having an energy expenditure of moderate-to-vigorous intensity, which is associated with health benefits. 4  The time spent in each activity  was summed and the average hours/day calculated. For screen time, students were asked to think about an average week and to report the number of hours usually spent daily watching TV, playing video games, and using a computer (for fun and/or homework). The response categories were ‘not at all; less than 1 hour/day; 1- 2 hours/day and; 3 or more hours/day.’ Total screen time was the sum of time spent watching TV, playing video games and using a computer.  We constructed a lifestyle behavior index based on our previous report on another survey of Australian children. 10  Accordingly, low physical activity was defined as reporting <60 minutes of total physical activity per day. High screen time was defined as reporting ≥2 hours of screen time per day. A dichotomous  variable representing high consumption of snack food was created using reported consumption of: salty snack foods (e.g. potato crisps or other salty snack such as corn crisps) and confectioneries (e.g. lollies, chocolate). 10   If the students’ reported intake of salty snack foods or confectionery alone, or both, was five or more times per week, they were classified as having a high snack food intake. High soft drink and/or cordial consumption  was defined as having one or more per day. Finally, low fruit and  vegetable intake was defined as not consuming two or more serves of fruit and three or more serves of vegetables per day. Each of the five obesogenic behavioral risk factors (i.e. low fruit and vegetable intake, low physical activity, high screen time, high soft drink intake, and high snack intake) were coded ‘1’ for present and ‘0’ for absent.  Assessment of potential confounders Parents were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire  which included socio-demographic information such as ethnicity, country of birth, highest level of parental education, and occupation. The ethnicity of the child was determined only if both parents shared that ethnic srcin. Otherwise, children were placed in a mixed ethnicity category. Ethnicity was classified on the basis of self-identification by the parents, combined with information about the place of birth of the child. Ethnic categories were consistent with the Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic groups: 18  1) Caucasian included children from an European background; 2) East Asian covered children whose parents srcinated from China, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Korea, Myanmar,  Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam; 3) South Asian included Indian, Sri Lankan and Pakistani; 4) Middle Eastern; or 5) others/mixed (includes all other ethnicities). Each child’s weight was measured without shoes using a freestanding SECA height rod (Model 220, Hamburg, Germany).  Weight in kilograms was measured using a standard portable  weighing machine, after removing any heavy clothing. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m 2  ). Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (v9.2, SAS Institute, NC) including t-tests, c 2 -tests and linear regression. General linear regression models (PROC GLM) were constructed to examine possible associations between combinations of modifiable lifestyle behaviors which were the independent  variables with QOL which was the dependent variable. Analysis of covariance was used to calculate mean PedsQL scores adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, parental education and BMI. We also stratified all analyses by boys and girls given that there are widely recognized sex differences in the prevalence and correlates of diet, physical activity and screen time. 10  Given the reduction in numbers due to stratification, we combined those with 0 or 1 lifestyle risk factors and those with 4 or 5 lifestyle risk factors for sex-stratified analyses. RESULTS Of the 1,213 children examined both at baseline and at follow-up, 742 were included for longitudinal analyses as these participants had complete dietary and physical activity data at baseline and PedsQL data at the 5-year examination. Table 1 shows the study characteristics of children included for prospective analyses. Children who engaged in five obesogenic lifestyle behaviors were more likely to be Caucasian but less likely to have tertiary qualified parents (Table 1). The prevalence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 obesogenic lifestyle risk factors was 4.2%, 17.1%, 30.7%, 30.5%, 13.9% and 3.6%, respectively. General linear model (GLM) was used to adjust for age, sex, ethnicity, parental education and BMI, and showed that a combination of 5 compared with 0 lifestyle risk factors at baseline  was associated with a lower physical summary score (   p trend  = 0.001) five years later in adolescence (Table 2). Significant associations were not observed between multiple obesogenic lifestyle behaviors and the PedsQL total score or any other domain scores. In boys, a significant reduction in both total score and physical summary score was observed with multiple unhealthy behaviors, 4.5-units (   p trend  = 0.02) and 4.2-units (   p trend  = 0.01), respectively (Table 3). Girls engaging in 4 or 5 versus 0 or 1 lifestyle risk factors at baseline, had 4.6-units lower PedsQL physical summary score (multivariable-adjusted  p trend  = 0.04) at the 5-year follow-up. In girls, significant associations were not observed between multiple lifestyle risk factors with scores in the total score or other PedsQL domains (data not shown).  Table 1 Study characteristics of Sydney Childhood Eye Study participants included in prospective analyses (n=742), stratified by the number of obesogenic lifestyle behaviors reported at baseline from 2004-5 to 2009-11 Number of lifestyle risk factors   Characteristics   0 (n=31)   1 (n=127)   2 (n=228)   3 (n=226)   4 (n=103)   5 (n=27)    p  -value  Boys, %  15 (48.4) 58 (45.7) 124 (54.4) 110 (48.7) 57 (55.3) 11 (40.7) 0.43  Age,  yrs   12.9 (0.5) 12.8 (0.4) 12.8 (0.5) 12.8 (0.4) 12.7 (0.4) 12.6 (0.4) 0.72 Ethnicity, %  Caucasian 21 (67.7) 96 (75.6) 143 (62.7) 123 (54.4) 67 (65.1) 19 (70.4) 0.02 East Asian 4 (12.9) 13 (10.2) 46 (20.2) 52 (23.0) 21 (20.4) 2 (7.4) Middle Eastern 0 (0.0) 2 (1.6) 9 (4.0) 9 (4.0) 2 (1.9) 3 (11.1) Other 6 (19.4) 16 (12.6) 30 (13.2) 42 (18.6) 13 (12.6) 3 (11.1)  Tertiary qualified parents, %  17 (54.8) 82 (64.6) 130 (57.0) 122 (54.0) 50 (48.5) 9 (33.3) 0.04 Body mass index, kg/m  2   18.8 (2.8) 20.2 (4.4) 19.8 (3.9) 20.2 (3.6) 19.2 (4.0) 19.0 (3.6) 0.06  Values are mean (SD) for continuous variables, and n   (%) for categorical variables.    Reformatted author version Page 3 DISCUSSION  The current study contributes to new knowledge, as it examined the association between a combination of modifiable health behaviors and health-related QOL during adolescence. Schoolchildren engaging in all 5 obesogenic lifestyle behaviors compared with their peers who did not engage in any of these behaviors at baseline, had poorer PedsQL physical summary score, five years later during adolescence. This association was independent of the influences of BMI, and socio-economic indicators such as parental education. Boys reporting 4 or 5  versus 0 or 1 lifestyle risk factors had significantly lower total PedsQL and physical summary scores, five years later. In girls, there was a significant combined effect of obesogenic lifestyle behaviors on the PedsQL physical summary score only.  We found that 19% of boys and 23% of girls engaged in one or none of the five obesogenic behavioral risk factors at baseline.  This is similar to the previously observed prevalence of 22% and 30% of Australian boys and girls, respectively, who reported one or none of the lifestyle risk factors. 10  Also, a US study of adolescents aged 11-15 years reported that nearly 80% had multiple risk behaviors and only 2% met guidelines for physical activity, television viewing and servings of fruit and vegetables. 19   This is comparable to the 96% of schoolchildren in our cohort that had one or more obesogenic factors. The high prevalence of multiple poor health behaviors in our adolescent cohort, confirms data from other studies showing that most schoolchildren fail to meet multiple dietary and physical activity recommendations. 19   These findings underscore the importance of developing effective interventions to help adolescents improve their lifestyle and dietary habits. Despite health promotion programs frequently targeting multiple obesogenic risk factors, little is known about the best approaches to stimulating multiple health behavior change in adolescents. 19   The temporal association between a combination of multiple obesogenic behaviors and lower PedsQL scores, concurs with an adult study that showed the accumulation of lifestyle risk factors  was strongly associated with poorer general health and physical functioning. 20  It is likely that youth in this study with healthier behavioral patterns are more likely to report more positive perceptions of their health, in keeping with prior studies. 21  It is also possible that their family environment is supportive, facilitating healthier eating habits and behaviors. 22  Diets which include greater consumption of fruits and vegetables have been shown to have a beneficial impact on health-related QOL of adults and children. 7,23  Moreover, we previously showed that more time spent in physical activity and less screen time was associated with higher total PedsQL scores among adolescents. 4  Boys and girls reporting 4 or 5 obesogenic risk factors at baseline  were at a greater risk of poorer functioning in the physical dimension of the PedsQL. This association is most likely driven by leading a physically inactive lifestyle, as this is the group of adolescents most likely to report limitations in basic activities of daily living such as walking several blocks and lifting. 4  Excessive recreational screen time could also influence physical functioning, particularly as a prior study demonstrated that frequent screen time is related to poorer physical health. 24  For example, this could be because screen time potentially displaces physical activity  which in turn reduces overall physical capabilities. 4,24,25   Alternatively, the link between unhealthy behaviors and poor physical health could be explained by poor dietary habits. Fruit and vegetable consumption could influence physical health through several pathways relating to numerous biologically active components. These may, for example, be short-term through influencing bowel habits. 26  A UK adult study reported a direct significant association between fruit and vegetable consumption and self-reported physical functional health and a less consistent relationship with mental health. 26  Further, a randomized controlled trial in adults showed that an increase in fruit and  vegetable consumption was associated with a change in physical health but not mental functioning. 27  Given that reduced physical functioning predicts adverse health outcomes, 27  the observed impact of multiple unhealthy behaviors on physical well-being could be important in terms of later adult health. Our findings could have important public health implications, given that adolescence involves many major physical, social and psychological changes. 22  Additionally, interventions addressing multiple lifestyle behaviors may hold greater promise than those aimed at isolated behaviors. 28,29  Hence, findings from this study highlight the importance of planning evidence-based health promotion programs aimed at preventing adolescents from initiating an unhealthy lifestyle and which foster risk-reduction and cessation skills in those already engaged in such obesogenic health behaviors. 5  For example, a comprehensive school health approach that integrates nutrition education, nutrition policy, healthy food services and various physical activity strategies into a  whole school model, 8  could contribute to potential improvements in youth QOL in the long-term. We caution, however, that our results need to be replicated in other adolescent cohort studies, and further studies are warranted to establish how these obesogenic lifestyle behaviors co-vary over time and predict poorer health-related QOL as adolescents transition into adulthood. One of the strengths of this study is that it investigated the summative effect of obesogenic lifestyle behaviors, while most other adolescent cohorts have focused on the link between single health behaviors and health-related QOL. Other strengths include its longitudinal design, random cluster sample of a relatively large number of schoolchildren and use of a validated pediatric health-related QOL instrument. 4  The present study also has some limitations. First, although ours is a cohort study, only demographic, diet, screen time and physical activity data but not PedsQL data were collected at the baseline survey. Hence, we cannot determine the association between multiple obesogenic lifestyle risk factors with health-related QOL at age 12, nor can  we determine changes in health-related QOL over the 5 years. Second, while we adjusted for a number of important confounders, we cannot disregard the possibility that other unmeasured factors such as societal factors and parental health behaviors could have influenced our findings. For instance, self-reported health outcomes could be particularly susceptible to social desirability bias, 30  however, in the current study we did not  Table 2 Prospective association between the number of lifestyle risk factors at baseline (at age 12) and adjusted mean Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) scores 5 years later (at age17-18) in the Sydney Childhood Eye Study (n=742). Number of lifestyle risk factors   PedsQL domains, adjusted mean (SE)   †   0 (n=31)   1 (n=127)   2 (n=228)   3 (n=226)   4 (n=103)   5 (n=27)   b † ‡   (p   for trend)   Total score 85.2 (2.3) 81.8 (1.4) 81.1 (1.2) 80.3 (1.2) 79.8 (1.5) 81.5 (2.6) -0.77 (0.05) Physical summary 97.5 (2.4) 93.3 (1.4) 92.1 (1.1) 90.2 (1.1) 90.2 (1.5) 88.3 (2.6) -1.45 (0.001) Psychosocial summary 79.0 (2.8) 76.2 (1.7) 75.6 (1.4) 75.2 (1.4) 74.6 (1.8) 78.2 (3.1) -0.43 (0.37) Emotional 78.5 (3.7) 73.2 (2.2) 74.1 (1.8) 74.2 (1.8) 73.6 (2.3) 76.5 (4.1) -0.12 (0.85) Social 93.2 (2.7) 90.7 (1.6) 88.8 (1.3) 90.3 (1.3) 88.9 (1.7) 87.9 (2.9) -0.54 (0.24) School 65.7 (4.1) 65.5 (2.4) 64.6 (2.0) 61.9 (2.0) 62.0 (2.6) 70.6 (4.5) -0.64 (0.36) †  Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, parental education. ‡ Beta (b) coefficients indicating the slope of the relationship between lifestyle risk factors and each PedsQL domain  Table 3 Prospective association between the number of lifestyle risk factors at baseline and adjusted mean Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) scores in boys from the Sydney Childhood Eye Study, from 2004-5 to 2009-11 (n=375) †  Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, parental education. ‡ Beta (b) coefficients indicating the slope of the relationship between lifestyle risk factors and each PedsQL domain Number of lifestyle risk factors   PedsQL domains, adjusted mean (SE)   †   0 or 1 (n=73)   2 (n=124)   3 (n=110)   4 or 5 (n=68)   b † ‡   (  p   for trend)   Total score 84.7 (1.8) 82.7 (1.5) 82.1 (1.6) 80.2 (1.8) -1.37 (0.02) Physical summary 97.3 (1.6) 95.6 (1.3) 93.1 (1.3) 93.1 (1.6) -1.57 (0.01) Psychosocial summary 78.2 (2.3) 76.1 (2.0) 76.6 (2.0) 73.6 (2.3) -1.21 (0.09) Emotional 79.3 (2.8) 77.3 (2.4) 78.0 (2.4) 73.9 (2.8) -1.39 (0.14) Social 90.0 (2.2) 87.7 (1.8) 90.3 (1.9) 85.6 (2.2) -0.80 (0.31) School 65.3 (3.5) 63.6 (2.9) 61.6 (3.0) 61.6 (3.5) -1.34 (0.22)  Reformatted author version Page 4 administer any scales that measure the influence of potential socially desirable responses. 30  Third, in children, FFQs are known to commonly over-report dietary intake, and in general are not able to capture energy intake reliably. 31  Nevertheless, we had taken steps in the FFQ data cleaning process to exclude participants who were under- or over-reporters. Finally, we need to caution about the generalisability of our findings. Our study sample was predominantly Caucasian and not a random sample of the wider Australian population. While we examined children of East and Southeast Asian, and Middle Eastern ethnicities, we had a very low proportion of other ethnic groups e.g., Indigenous  Australians. In conclusion, we show that a higher number of obesogenic lifestyle behaviors were associated with subsequent poorer health-related QOL during adolescence. This association was stronger for the physical domain of the PedsQL among boys and girls.  These findings could contribute to the evidence-base for planning multifaceted intervention strategies that promote a combination of healthy eating and active living, which will not only help maintain a healthy weight status but also improve the QOL of adolescents. Funding disclosure:  The Sydney Childhood Eye Study was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant No. 253732 and 512530); the Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney; and the Vision Co-operative Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, and the National Heart Foundation of  Australia (Grant no. G11S 6106), Melbourne, Australia. Conflict of interest: none to declare   REFERENCES 1. Sherman EM, Slick DJ, Connolly MB, Steinbok P, Camfield C, Eyrl KL, Massey C, Farrell K. Validity of three measures of health-related quality of life in children with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43:1230-1238. 2. Williams J, Wake M, Hesketh K, Maher E, Waters E. Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children.  JAMA. 2005;293:70-76. 3. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Forty-fifth edition, 1-18. 2006. World Health Organization. Basic Documents. 4. Gopinath B, Hardy LL, Baur LA, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors and health-related quality of life in adolescents. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e167-e174. 5. Zahran HS, Zack MM, Vernon-Smiley ME, Hertz MF. Health-related quality of life and behaviors risky to health among adults aged 18-24 years in secondary or higher education--United States, 2003-2005. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:389-397. 6. Zack MM, Moriarty DG, Stroup DF, Ford ES, Mokdad AH.  Worsening trends in adult health-related quality of life and self -rated health-United States, 1993-2001. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:493-505. 7. Wang H, Sekine M, Chen X, Yamagami T, Kagamimori S. Lifestyle at 3 years of age and quality of life (QOL) in first-year junior high school students in Japan: results of the  Toyama Birth Cohort Study. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:257-265. 8. Wu XY, Ohinmaa A, Veugelers PJ. Diet quality, physical activity, body weight and health-related quality of life among grade 5 students in Canada. Public Health Nutr. 2011;1-7. 9. Boyle SE, Jones GL, Walters SJ. Physical activity, quality of life, weight status and diet in adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:943-954. 10. Hardy LL, Grunseit A, Khambalia A, Bell C, Wolfenden L, Milat AJ. Co-occurrence of Obesogenic Risk Factors Among  Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:265-271. 11. Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Smith W, Morgan IG, Martin FJ, Mitchell P. Methods for a population-based study of myopia and other eye conditions in school children: the Sydney Myopia Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2005;12:59-69. 12. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37:126-139. 13. Gopinath B, Flood VM, Wang JJ, Smith W, Rochtchina E, Louie JC, Wong TY, Brand-Miller J, Mitchell P. Carbohydrate nutrition is associated with changes in the retinal vascular structure and branching pattern in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:1215-1222. 14. Watson JF, Collins CE, Sibbritt DW, Dibley MJ, Garg ML. Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:62. 15. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. NUTTAB 2006. Canberra, Australia: FSANZ, 2007. 2011. 2011. 16. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. NUTTAB 2010. Canberra, Australia: FSANZ, 2010. 17. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. AUSNUT 2007. Canberra, Australia: FSANZ, 2007. 18. ABS. Australian standard classification of cultural and ethnic groups (ASCCEG). 2nd edition(1249.0), 1-134. 2005. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia. 19. Sanchez A, Norman GJ, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Cella J, Patrick K. Patterns and correlates of physical activity and nutrition behaviors in adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:124-130. 20. Li C, Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Jiles R, Giles WH. Clustering of multiple healthy lifestyle habits and health-related quality of life among U.S. adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1770-1776. 21. Harrington J, Perry IJ, Lutomski J, Fitzgerald AP, Shiely F, McGee H et al. Living longer and feeling better: healthy lifestyle, self-rated health, obesity and depression in Ireland. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:91-95. 22. Costarelli V, Koretsi E, Georgitsogianni E. Health-related quality of life of Greek adolescents: the role of the Mediterranean diet. Qual Life Res. 2012. 23. Henriquez SP, Ruano C, de Irala J, Ruiz-Canela M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Sanchez-Villegas A. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and quality of life in the SUN Project. Eur  J Clin Nutr. 2012;66:360-368. 24. Iannotti RJ, Kogan MD, Janssen I, Boyce WF. Patterns of adolescent physical activity, screen-based media use, and positive and negative health indicators in the U.S. and Canada.  J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:493-499. 25. Lacy KE, Allender SE, Kremer PJ, Silva-Sanigorski AM, Millar LM, Moodie ML, Mathews LB, Malakellis M, Swinburn BA. Screen time and physical activity behaviours are associated with health-related quality of life in Australian adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2011. 26. Myint PK, Welch AA, Bingham SA, Surtees PG, Wainwright NW, Luben RN et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and self-reported functional health in men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk): a population-based cross-sectional study. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:34-41. 27. Steptoe A, Perkins-Porras L, Hilton S, Rink E, Cappuccio FP. Quality of life and self-rated health in relation to changes in fruit and vegetable intake and in plasma vitamins C and E in a randomised trial of behavioural and nutritional education counselling. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:177-184. 28. Dumith SC, Muniz LC, Tassitano RM, Hallal PC, Menezes  AM. Clustering of risk factors for chronic diseases among adolescents from Southern Brazil. Prev Med. 2012;54:393-396. 29. Goldstein MG, Whitlock EP, DePue J. Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care. Summary of research evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:61-79. 30. Nolte S, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Absence of social desirability bias in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management interventions. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:114. 31. Burrows TL, Martin RJ, Collins CE. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1501-1510.
Advertisement
MostRelated
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x